Ordnance Survey OpenSpace: DOA

“UK’s Ordnance Survey has released (a closed alpha of) OpenSpace, an API for their maps! I’ve been wrong to criticize them for their paleogeographic ways when all along they were stealthily working to embrace us neos.”

That was my first impression when I read Ed Parsons’s announcement of the news. But Ed’s post also mentioned something about tile limits, and from the Guardian I learn that this API project is something “urged” onto the OS by the UK government’s Cabinet Office.

Time to dig a bit. And that’s when we go from the sublime to the ridiculous. From their FAQ:

1.4 How much data am I allowed to use?
OS OpenSpace allows your API key to access up to 30 000 tiles of data and up to 1 000 place name look-ups per day for free.

5.4 My site gets a lot of traffic, what can I do?
Congratulations :! Contact us to talk about the different possibilities we may be able to offer you. If you are interested in commercialising your application, take a look at point 6.2 of the FAQs.

So let’s say I add an embedded OpenSpace map to a blog post on Ogle Earth that shows 9 tiles. That should last me about the first 12 hours of every day. Sorry late-rising Californians, my quota is up! Should I add two such maps within 15 posts of each other, so that the front page of the blog displays a total of 18 squares, then Europe is out of luck too. Translation from OSese: Feel free to have a website that uses our maps, as long as it is obscure and unpopular.

Oh wait, there are licensing options available to those with sites that get “a lot of traffic”. But they are in dense legalese and for “businesses” and “value-added products” and “branded published products” with “royalty models” and “product schedules”… Dudes. I’m a blogger. WTF? Are we really all supposed to call you to find the price?

6.3 Can I have adverts like Google Ads on my website? (Is it only on the same page as the map or the whole site?)
No, please see the OS OpenSpace Developer Agreement (there can be no form of financial gain).

6.4 Can I build an application for Facebook/MySpace/any other commercial website?
The application you build cannot result in any financial gain to you (the developer of the application), the user or any other party; please see the OS OpenSpace Developer Agreement.

Well, which is it? “Only on the same page as the map or on the whole site?” Does anyone know? Did someone copy-editing the FAQ write that and accidentally leave it in? Not that it matters; whatever the answer will be, this is so stupid and tone-deaf to the realities of Web 2.0 that I’m practically sputtering into my Malay gin & tonic. Pages and websites are artificial constructs in Web 2.0, as we’ve now all moved on to services aggregated from wherever they may originate. Do I really have to set up an ad-free www.NotOgleEarth.com and link to maps served from there as popups or iframes every time I want to use OpenSpace? Is OS not aware that advertising such as Google ads is ubiquitous on the blogs and hobby sites that the OpenSpace API is ostensibly for? For the overwhelming majority of bloggers — certainly those for whom 30,000 tiles per day is plenty — the ads at most help defray hosting costs, or else they are injected by web hosters to pay for free hosting services. Does the Ordnance Survey really think all these people are going to remove their Google ads from an entire site forever (or switch provider) if they once used OpenSpace to show their favorite route to work in a blog post now buried somewhere deep in the archives?

Mapperz, in his wonderfully efficient telegraphese style, has some further observations:

Note: Any Content you create using the Open Space API – Will not be yours, as it is ‘dervived’ from Ordance Survey Products. […]

No 1:25,000 (Explorer range) or 1:10,000 Rasters

OpenSpace will not be used by anyone. With the current restrictions it is dead on arrival. Perhaps that was the intention?

[Wait, the Developer Agreement has more:

2.6 The Website is provided for Use by private individuals strictly for the Purpose. You may not use the Website, the Ordnance Survey API or the Ordnance Survey Data or any part thereof in connection with any other purpose.

“Purpose” means any purpose or activity which (i) is not undertaken for Financial Gain; or (ii) does not result in Financial Gain to you or any User or any third party used by or in connection with you or any User; or (iii) is not connected to any company, partnership, sole trader or other business entity or professional body, any educational institution, or any central or local government or other public sector body; excluding for the express avoidance of doubt use in relation to any website that carries paid for advertising, and/or use by the afore-mentioned entities in their day to day activities, on their intranet or in connection with any display, promotion or advertising;

So does this mean that other people can link to the free popup OpenSpace maps on NotOgleEarth.com, but not me from OgleEarth.com? Or can you link to them only from sites that themselves do not have ads? What about sites that link to those? Is this a nefarious plot to rid the world of Google Ads by someone somewhere on the web linking to a single OpenSpace map?:-)]

Links: Antarctic sensor web coming, Google Sky Maps coming, KnitML

The Earth from above, and a little bit from the side

Perhaps you’ve seen them outside London’s Natural History Museum last summer, or else in a Stockholm park, or in any number of places around the world — a travelling exhibit with stunning aerial photographs by Yann Arthus Bertrand. They’ve just now also shown up in Google Earth’s Global Awareness base layer — over 400 of them. Here’s the layer’s official site, and here is the blog announcement.

These photos provide hours’ worth of ogling pleasure. Until now, my main frustration with them was wondering where they were taken. No more. My new frustration with them is that they are georeferenced but not — we need to neologize here — geopositioned, by which I mean placed as overlays in Google Earth with the tilt and roll and zoom and field of view set just so, so that we can see exactly where the shot was taken from.

To show you what I mean, I took a photo of islands in a lake in Egypt’s Siwa oasis and positioned it in Google Earth so that when you fly into the picture, it “exactly” matches the view in Google Earth. Here is the KMZ file.

siawwpic.jpg

siwawopic.jpg

I confess it took me a long time to fidget with the controls to get that image to fit, but I was trying to make a point:-) Use the opacity slider to check the accuracy.

Geopositioning all photos is not really a scalable proposal — unless we all did one each, of course. Also, not all images lend themselves to this treatment — some are too close, others are of inconstant patterns such as drifting sandbanks.

Voila, yet another way Google Earth will quash your productivity — unless you can call it “research” for a blog post:-)

[Update 17:10 UTC: It just struck me that it would be very cool if there were to be a button in Google Earth that let you “paint” that photo from that perspective on top of the base layer, taking into account the height mesh (DEM) data and buildings, so that you could subsequently fly over it. I have no idea whether that would be a trivial feature to implement, but it is definitely where research projects are headed, and it would make for a great way to turn 2D images into 3D images. Google’s PhotoOverlay controls are obviously sufficient to accurately geoposition such a shot. Scalability remains the main problem, here, I think.]

Stone circle or just stoned? Swedish geodatabase to the rescue

Much as we’d love to find evidence of how astronomically savvy our ancestors were, sometimes a stone in the ground is just a stone in the ground. In Sweden this week, noted media hound and self-ascribed “archeoastronomer” Bob Lind announced to great media fanfare that he had found a 3,000-year old stone circle in Southern Sweden, complete with a “large phallus” pointing north.

Since a good false story reported uncritically is better than no story, much of the media went along, including the otherwise reliable The Local (tsk).

But then came the backlash of the experts. Martin Rundkvist, who writes the excellent Aardvarchaeology blog and who happens to be Swedish, led the charge. It turns out (Swedish) that the site is not new at all, but a stone-age cemetery that’s been known to archaeologists since the 1930s.

The one good thing to come out of this little media debacle is that it vindicates the pioneering work of Sweden’s Office of Antiquities when it comes to putting existing archaeological discoveries on the map. Their geographic database of historical monuments with KML output has been blogged on Ogle Earth before — for today’s story, I can use it to link to the precise location of the “find” that wasn’t: Ravlunda 169:1. From there, you can get KML, or else see it on Sweden’s two homegrown mapping sites, both of whom have the area in higher resolution than Google. (Eniro’s is the best).

Bob Lind could have checked that database to see if he wasn’t about to do something stupid, but that would have meant media obscurity. (For example, he could have looked at all the results for the local area, and then exported them to KML to see if the location of his “find” had a marker on it.)

Still, it’s good to know that the resource exists for real archaeologists.

(Via Vector One)

EarthNC’s trip and route planner

I’ve just arrived in soggy Kuala Lumpur, tired and jet lagged after far too long in the purgatory that is Dubai airport. Tomorrow starts Global Knowledge Conference III, theme: Emerging People, Emerging Markets, Emerging Technologies. If I see any really cool new applications of GIS in the service of development, I will be sure to blog them. In the meantime, I am grateful to EarthNC for writing the rest of this post, so I can get some sleep:

EarthNC, Inc is pleased to announce the general availability of the EarthNC Google Earth Trip and Route Planner tool. The Trip and Route Planner provides a simple method to plan trips or routes using Google Earth and export them directly to Garmin USB GPS devices using the free Garmin Communicator plugin. For non-Garmin GPS devices, EarthNC provides a GPX file download option. With the release of the latest Garmin Communicator Plugin, the EarthNC Trip and Route Tool works on both Macintosh and Windows computers. [This is new!]

The EarthNC Trip and Route tool extends EarthNC’s novel ‘TakItWithMe’ Google Maps serviceto the 3D Google Earth platform. Trip planning and export is done with a few easy steps. To share trips, users can e-mail their trip folders to friends and family within Google Earth.

To help get users up and running quickly, EarthNC has produced a short video tutorial which demonstrates Google Earth trip and route creation, GPS export, and advanced tips:

The Trip and Route Tool is a free service of EarthNC.

(And if you’re still here, on a completely unrelated matter, also check out Google Maps API Blog’s Using the Chart API in KML for Quick Data Visualization.)

Links: Earth monitoring, neo geo who?, Flickr places explained, Syria censorship

  • Earth monitoring: Nature has a special issue on Earth monitoring out. Nature reporter Declan Butler blogs it, and provides links to PDFs of some of the articles.
  • How now, neo geo? In case you’ve missed it, over on All Points Blog a debate has erupted as to whether neogeography is GIS or not. One unintentionally funny comment:

    This “neogeo” can provide acuraccy? [sic]

    The guardians of the GIS gate are wondering whether neogeographers should be let in. The problem is that we barbarians are already inside the gate, and we’re charming the socks off the good burghers’ daughters. (Andrew Turner at High Earth Orbit has more.)

  • Flickr Places: Flickr’s Dan Catt explains the rationale behind the new Flickr places pages over on Geobloggers. I hadn’t quite gotten the point of these pages before — it feels less dynamic than what went before, but Dann explains thus:

    The “Places” project is one that’s been brewing for quite a while. My glib reason for having them, is actually to have a page from which we can hang location based geoRSS (and KML) feeds off. I mean we have geoRSS feeds for San Francisco and so on, but up to now no-where on the site that you can get to them from.

    So expect KML (network?) links soon.

    That said, I’m still wishing for something that was even more versatile — GeoRSS and KML feeds for pictures that are within a certain radius of a coordinate or within bounding boxes would be my choice. That way, you’d be able to collect images from odd places like Antarctic bases, a particular stretch of coast off Ireland, or just the three block area around where I live.

  • Censored in Syria? So Facebook is blocked in Syria due to Israeli “infiltration”. Zeinobia on Arabicareport assumes the reason you can’t get Google Earth in Syria is for the same reason — Syrian government censorship — but in this particular case she’s wrong. It’s US export regulations that forbid Google from making Google Earth available in Syria (and Cuba and Sudan and no doubt North Korea, were anyone other than Dear Leader to have an internet connection).
  • Nice maps: Digital Urban points to “possibly the best city map in the world”, on Edushi.com. Surely not scalable, unless you’ve got cheap labor, and lots of it. If this being the Chinese century means cuter maps, I’m all for it:-)
  • Hyperwords: Also at the Berlin Online Educa, Hyperwords had a stand. They are the makers of a completely free Firefox plugin that lets you do an astonishing amount of contextual menu-based actions on the words on a web page — including mapping any location name to Google Maps.
  • GPS cameras anyone? CNET on whether 2008 will be the year of GPS-enabled cameras. The reporter is skeptical — GPS units need to fix their positions more quickly before GPS can go mainstream. I’d agree. Apparently, improvements are in the works.
  • Photosynth competition: Microsoft’s Photosynth looks like it might be getting competition, according to Wired:

    Researchers at the University of Washington have developed a piece of software that synthesizes thousands of photos, digitally edits out your kids cheesing for the camera, calculates where each photographer was standing when they took the shot. By comparing two photos taken from slightly different perspectives, the software applies principles of computer vision to figure out the distance to each point. The app then stitches the photos together to create a highly detailed 3-D model of the Statue of Liberty, the Grand Canyon, or any number of tourist destinations getting snapped by the minute.

    See the comments.

  • ArcGIS converter: Mapperz looks at ET Geowizards 9.7, which he calls “one of the best all-round third party extensions you can get for ArcGIS.” Lots of options for converting to and from KML.
  • KML@OGC feedback wanted: You’ve got until January 3 to comment on the OGC’s draft KML 2.2 standard.
  • Where 2.0: O’Reilly Radar on what to expect at next year’s Where 2.0.
  • Photo map choice: Locr.com, which lets you upload and geotag photos (including from your mobile) boasts it is the only photo sharing site where you can choose your map: Microsoft’s, Yahoo’s or Google’s imagery.

Géoportail gets 3D buildings, but stays closed

France’s Géoportail adds 3D buildings to its Skyline Globe-powered 3D web browsing tool, which it first introduced to Windows browsers in back July 2007 (after launching the 2D version in the summer of 2006).

The announcement by Minister of Ecology Jean-Louis Borloo says, and I translate here,

With Géoportail, France has the first European portal for accessing geographic information in three dimensions. It shows off the unique knowledge of the [state GIS agency] IGN, which has always provided cutting edge public service.

As a result, most French blogs are reporting the news that Géoportail has just added 3D, when it has in fact had it since July. (The buildings are new — as are some new default layers, like walks and georeferenced archival news videos).

And while Géoportail is indeed the first portal made by Europeans for 3D mapping (albeit by licensing American technology), it is not the first portal to show Europe in 3D. In fact, it still doesn’t. (Google Earth, NASA World Wind and Microsoft Virtual Earth came before and do all of Europe. Géoportail shows nothing beyond France’s borders.)

Géoportail certainly is much more impressive that the UK Ordnance Survey’s “outreach” effort, but both are just as closed in a time when everything online is moving towards open, interoperable, mashable standards. KML is now an OGC standard, most recently embraced by Microsoft. Where is the support By IGN and OS? Why can’t I export anything to mash up? Where are the APIs? The USGS, on the other hand, gets it.

Time to reiterate: National GIS agencies should concentrate on getting the best GIS content, acting as a repository for it, and making it accessible to all. Competing with Google and Microsoft to provide end-user services based on this content is a waste of public resources, especially as Google and Microsoft will always do it better.

Notes on the political, social and scientific impact of networked digital maps and geospatial imagery, with a special focus on Google Earth.