Pict’Earth: Live DIY aerial photography

I’ve been trying to wrap my head around Pict’Earth, a remarkable system flagged by Frank that transmits live aerial photography from an unmanned flying drone to a computer on the ground, where it is georeferenced and served to Google Earth or ArcGIS Explorer clients in real time.

It sounds almost too good to be true, but it’s legit. Fabrice Fasquel and David Riallant are French GIS pros. A third listed contact, Thierry Rousselin has his own GIS blog, Géo 212.

So how does it all work? Before live integration with Google Earth and ArcGIS Explorer came along, there was Le Cyclope, a flying drone for taking aerial digital photography, guided remotely by a human via a live video downlink. First developed in 2000, a lot of the technical information is available in French (alas in Flash) on the site of the company that created the kit, Visions du Ciel. What follows are the technical highlights, translated.

The drone weights 2.5 kg, and can fly up to a height of 300 meters and within a circumference of 1 km, at least within the law in France. It’s velocity is between 3-25 km/h, and the engine is electric, with a battery charge that is enough for 15 minutes of flight. The effective resolution of the captured imagery is 4 centimeters per pixel at a height of 150 meters with a 5 megapixel camera. The live video is relayed via a 2.4 Ghz transmitter to a receiver in the field, connected to a laptop or to the pilot’s video goggles.

The drone is very versatile — instead of capturing imagery, it could be made to capture georeferenced temperatures, humidity, luminosity, pollution or radioactivity, on demand, depending on the installed receptor.

To see it in action, there is a video to download (zipped Quicktime) on the site, different from the one Frank found on Google Video.

If you want to buy one, here are the complete technical specifications as a PDF. The price, alas, is only available on demand. (I’ve asked, in the meantime:-) Visions du Ciel also offers a processing service for images captured with the Cyclope, which includes georeferencing and stitching, with a turnaround time of 12-24 hours. Prices here too are on demand.

But what, then, is Pict’Earth? For this new technology, the specifics are not as detailed. From Visions du Ciel‘s product site (alas also in Flash), it is clear that it Pict’Earth adds a layer of functionality to the Cyclope drone by transmitting the photographic imagery it captures, along with GPS data, live to the ground, where it is processed and collated in real time and served in a format readable to Google Earth and ESRI ArcGIS Explorer. It’s not clear whether this format is a simple KML network link, but I suspect it is. As the site makes clear, the intention is to let an analysis team give Cyclope’s pilot live instructions based on the photography being transmitted in real time.

It would be great to see a live demo of this (again, I’ve asked) because I imagine the real tour-de-force lies in the automated real-time georeferencing and stitching of the transmitted photography. If that can really be done at a high level of quality, then I will be impressed, as it strikes me as a particularly difficult task to automate. Perhaps the live transmission of imagery is only intended as an initial first draft, with proper processing after the flight.

In any case, this is a wonderful innovation. Beachfront celebrity weddings will never be safe from paparazzi again:-)

5 thoughts on “Pict’Earth: Live DIY aerial photography”

  1. Nothing really new here other than a interesting demo video from a French guy who is talking to geotaggers. There are any number of like solutions including baloons, kites, and model UAVs all ready kit integrated from model plane manufacturers. The last step to GE may be a the only interesting portion although the same real-time has been available for GISes for, must be four or five years now. Better radios and longer batteries are readily available BTW. If fact for the interested a complete automomous solution can be had. This interest likely deserves a better summary. An all-in price for an “entry” solution likely around $6kUSD. Watch for it at my blogg above.

  2. Oh well I still think that I’m a jinx when it comes to aerial photography. I was once assigned to take pictures of graduates in a school from the top view. I was told that the pictorial will start as soon as the confetti starts flying. Then I was also tasked to take pictures of flying caps with tussel from the ground view. What I got was all trash. One of the photos look like as if I took a picture of a bunch of confetti put on a table. They don’t look like they’re flying. Worst was the picture printed from a flying toga cap.

Comments are closed.